Darren New schrieb:

> I'm not sure how to cleanly turn that into a class without wrapping 
> every single function. None of those functions take a pointer to your 
> own class, so there's a bunch of casting on every creation at a minimum, 
> and you have to hope your class is laid out the same as the parent 
> struct and all that.

Fun fact about structs in C++: They /are/ classes. Only major difference 
(IIRC) being that their members default to "public:".

Classes only start to really diverge from classic C structs when you go 
for stuff like virtual methods or multiple inheritance. In the former 
case there'll be a few hidden data members that C++ will automatically 
add, while in the latter case... heck, I have not the slightest clue :-)

Post a reply to this message