Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:04:27 -0400, Saul Luizaga wrote:
> 
>>  See? it was there all the
>> time, you just had to look for it.
> 
> That really wasn't necessary.  Here's how you're coming across to me:
> 
> 
> Saul:  Hey, there's this really cool thing I know about!
> World:  What's the benefit?
> Saul:  Why don't you go and do your own research on it?  Do I have to 
> tell you everything?  Geez.
> 
> IOW, you're trying to tell people there's this thing you think is really 
> cool, and then punching people in the face when they ask questions about 
> it and telling them to search for themselves - and not even in a nice way.
> 
> And you wonder why people are reacting negatively?
> 
> Jim

LOL, it wasn't like that, I posted links to very informative articles 
showing realistic breakthroughs. On those links was abundant information 
to spider about. As a last resort you can Google WCG website to find it, 
or to know what others are writing/saying about it.

  If you had visited the site you'll give me some credit, at the main 
page they have links and pulldown menus with informative pages and with 
explanations better than I could ever give to you all. He unnecessarily 
alarmed all the people who visit this newsgroup questioning things, 
making a bottle neck, waiting for my not-so-well-informed-explanations 
to decide if it's worth it going to actual site and inform yourselves, 
doesn't this sounds a little bit illogical? It does to me.

When people post things here I go to the links and dig everything I want 
to know I don't question the poster with questions I can answer myself 
making a few clicks with the mouse. And most people do this, why I 
deserve less?

Post a reply to this message