somebody wrote:
> When someone goes on a rampage in a civilian setting, gun nuts are quick to
> point out that had the other people had guns as well, the shooter would have
> been stopped before he could inflict any serious damage. I wonder about
> their angle now.

As a retired member of the US military, I can affirm that by military 
regulation, the victims were prohibited from bearing firearms in the 
place where they were killed.

Regards,
John

Post a reply to this message