Warp schrieb:
>   Check the last parameter of this constructor:
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/z9ah41zs(VS.80).aspx
> 
>   Two major problems:
> 
> 1) A billionth of a second already has a well-established name: Nanosecond.
> 2) In reality that parameter represents microseconds.

1.5) In various non-English speaking cultures, "billion" may lead to 
confusion (see "Long and short scales" on Wikipedia). Nanoseconds, on 
the other hand, would be pretty clear for everyone.

Whichever programmer drafted up this interface, and whichever person had 
inspected it (if any), they obviously didn't have their brightest of 
days :-) (OTOH, you'd /hope/ so...)

Post a reply to this message