"Sabrina Kilian" <ski### [at] vtedu> wrote in message
news:4af4836d$1@news.povray.org...

> This wasn't a case of someone wandering on to a base without security
> catching them. He worked there, he was probably authorized to carry a
> gun on to the base if not carry it around with him. So the first guard
> on the scene sees someone he works with firing at someone else he works
> with, and may have had no clue which one was the bad guy. And if he
> opened fire, would the next guard to come along mistake him for the bad
> guy as well?

All valid argument as well for a civilian setting where everybody/majority
carries.

Post a reply to this message