clipka wrote:
> Saul Luizaga schrieb:
> Um... sorry, but what would be the sense of discussion without reason?

already explained in previous post.

> 
> BTW, I had the same reaction to your posting as Chambers did: "Duh... 
> does that guy /really/ base his current attitude towards Christianity 
> solely on the "facts" presented in a /movie/ - especially one targeted 
> at people getting a kick out of conspiracy theories?"

It turns out that The Davinci Code presents true facts about 
Christianity so yeah that would be a good argument to change your 
believes if your believes are based on manipulated facts, if you think 
is "just a movie" you have a poor judgment over it.

Post a reply to this message