clipka wrote:
> Saul Luizaga schrieb:
> Um... sorry, but what would be the sense of discussion without reason?
already explained in previous post.
>
> BTW, I had the same reaction to your posting as Chambers did: "Duh...
> does that guy /really/ base his current attitude towards Christianity
> solely on the "facts" presented in a /movie/ - especially one targeted
> at people getting a kick out of conspiracy theories?"
It turns out that The Davinci Code presents true facts about
Christianity so yeah that would be a good argument to change your
believes if your believes are based on manipulated facts, if you think
is "just a movie" you have a poor judgment over it.
Post a reply to this message
|