Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:28:02 -0700, stbenge wrote:
> 
>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:45:57 -0700, stbenge wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Illustrator -> Gimp?  Why not Illustrator -> Inkscape?
>>>> Because Inkscape is a vector art proggy, and Gimp is raster. Besides,
>>>> I hardly know Inkscape. I'm still trying to find the benefit of using
>>>> it...
>>> But Illustrator is also vector-based, not raster.  At least the
>>> Illustrator I remember using. ;-)
>> It is :) But fleshing-out 'toons in vector can really speed up the whole
>> process, if done right.
> 
> True, but like nemesis, I'm still having trouble seeing why not 
> Illustrator -> Inkscape, the two seem to have very similar features. :-)

It's far better for drawing mouse-only than Gimp too.  It's stylized 
caligraphic pen is a must.  It's pretty similar to the one in the Gimp, 
except your movements are sort of interpolated and thus don't end up all 
wiggly with a mouse.  Wiggly is also one of its many funky parameters... :)

Post a reply to this message