|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:28:02 -0700, stbenge wrote:
>
>> Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:45:57 -0700, stbenge wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Illustrator -> Gimp? Why not Illustrator -> Inkscape?
>>>> Because Inkscape is a vector art proggy, and Gimp is raster. Besides,
>>>> I hardly know Inkscape. I'm still trying to find the benefit of using
>>>> it...
>>> But Illustrator is also vector-based, not raster. At least the
>>> Illustrator I remember using. ;-)
>> It is :) But fleshing-out 'toons in vector can really speed up the whole
>> process, if done right.
>
> True, but like nemesis, I'm still having trouble seeing why not
> Illustrator -> Inkscape, the two seem to have very similar features. :-)
It's far better for drawing mouse-only than Gimp too. It's stylized
caligraphic pen is a must. It's pretty similar to the one in the Gimp,
except your movements are sort of interpolated and thus don't end up all
wiggly with a mouse. Wiggly is also one of its many funky parameters... :)
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |