On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:28:02 -0700, stbenge wrote:

> Jim Henderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:45:57 -0700, stbenge wrote:
>> 
>>>> Illustrator -> Gimp?  Why not Illustrator -> Inkscape?
>>> Because Inkscape is a vector art proggy, and Gimp is raster. Besides,
>>> I hardly know Inkscape. I'm still trying to find the benefit of using
>>> it...
>> 
>> But Illustrator is also vector-based, not raster.  At least the
>> Illustrator I remember using. ;-)
> 
> It is :) But fleshing-out 'toons in vector can really speed up the whole
> process, if done right.

True, but like nemesis, I'm still having trouble seeing why not 
Illustrator -> Inkscape, the two seem to have very similar features. :-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message