POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : NTFS vs. FAT32 defragmenting speed : Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 defragmenting speed Server Time
5 Sep 2024 07:22:12 EDT (-0400)
  Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 defragmenting speed  
From: Saul Luizaga
Date: 20 Oct 2009 16:30:55
Message: <4ade1dff@news.povray.org>
Darren New wrote:
> Warp wrote:
>>   "How much NTFS bookkeeping data is required (which the system puts 
>> inside
>> the MFT zone) if you have 750000 small files?"
> 
> Oh. MFT records are 1K, I think.
> 
> The "MFT zone" is different. That's an area of the disk that's right 
> after Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:32:44 -0700
> From: Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
> Organization: Not very...
> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Newsgroups: povray.off-topic
> Subject: Re: NTFS vs. FAT32 defragmenting speed
> References: <4ad61462@news.povray.org> <4ad98b1a$1@news.povray.org> 
> <4ad9d775@news.povray.org> <4ada2aea$1@news.povray.org> 
> <4adb3dc6$1@news.povray.org> <4adc379c$1@news.povray.org> 
> <4adc99d6$1@news.povray.org> <4add82cf$1@news.povray.org> 
> <4adddb8b@news.povray.org> <4adde059@news.povray.org>
> In-Reply-To: <4adde059@news.povray.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.88.29.4
> Message-ID: <4addf43d@news.povray.org>
> X-Trace: news.povray.org 1256059965 76.88.29.4 (20 Oct 2009 13:32:45 -0400)
> Lines: 33
> X-No-Archive: Yes
> X-Copyright: This copyrighted article comes from a private news server 
> and may NOT be distributed on USENET or other news servers.
> X-POV-Header: --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---
> Path: news.povray.org!not-for-mail
> Xref: news.povray.org povray.off-topic:236847
> 
> Warp wrote:
>>   "How much NTFS bookkeeping data is required (which the system puts 
>> inside
>> the MFT zone) if you have 750000 small files?"
> 
> Oh. MFT records are 1K, I think.
> 
> The "MFT zone" is different. That's an area of the disk that's right 
> after the main block of MFT that Windows tries not to put files into. 

Exactly, the whole this is just MFT.

> It's there because you can't defrag the MFT,

Actually PerfectDisk 10 can among other optimizations it does at 
Boot-time defrag, and even it changes its size to best fit a partition 
when needed. Unless you have an NTFS encrypted filePerfectDisk 10 
defrags *everything*, this give me the following brag right: don't blame 
me for having the best defragger out there, hehehehe :-D

> so as the MFT grows, it's 
> best to have space right after it to grow into. However, if you *do* 
> fill up the disk (or use a defragger that moves files into there, d'oh!) 

lol :-D

> you can use that space. It'll just get allocated last of all.
> 
> If you look at the MyDefrag, one of the defrag options is to move files 
> out of that space.
> 
> By default, it starts at 12.5% of the disk, and you can half that or 
> double that when you format the drive, depending on your anticipated needs.

really? I didn't know this, how do you do this?

>>   Or if we ask the same thing a bit differently: "How many files can you
>> have in an NTFS partition before a 1MB MTF zone gets full?"
> 
>  From defrag -v -a:
> 
> Master File Table (MFT) fragmentation
>     Total MFT size                      = 264 MB
>     MFT record count                    = 256,999
>     Percent MFT in use                  = 95
>     Total MFT fragments                 = 3
>


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.