|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Chambers wrote:
> nemesis wrote:
>> Neeum Zawan <m.n### [at] ieee org> wrote:
>>> - Deep Impact is nice in some ways. It suffered from the fact that
>>> Armageddon came out the same year. It's *much* better than its rival,
>>> though.
>>
>> Much, much better.
>
> I'd only partially agree. Deep Impact had much better emotional
> development, but was overall poorly written.
How poorly written? Any plot holes I'm unaware of? I liked how the
story kickstarts with a supposedly love affair of a high politician... I
find the plot quite tight.
> twist endings, etc). I guess something in Deep Impact must have
> resonated with you more than Armageddon did.
Certainly the emotional involvement was great, but so was the whole trip
to the asteroid very plausible and the consequences of the half-failure.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |