|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New schrieb:
>>> No, that's what I'm saying. "Player" in *this* context means a set
>>> of keys (obviously).
>>
>> What's obvious about that?
>
> Because I've read more than just one article on the subject?
Does that make it /obvious/ in this context? It may make it obvious to
/you/, but that's a different story.
> The point
> is to track down the key used to decrypt the content so the key can be
> added to the blacklists on future players.
No. The point is to track down the key (as you say) to add it to the
blacklist on future /discs/.
>> Hardware players are likely to have a Flash ROM or EEPROM anyway, so
>> it's no technical problem to equip each individual player with a
>> unique key.
>
> The hardware players are required to have FLASH in them, because they
> need to update to new versions of blacklists. They're not (last I read)
> required to actually have a separate key per player.
What on earth should the players blacklist?
Unless the security stuff also contains an /additional/ mechanism to
somehow identify pirated copies of movies. But that's not what the
article is talking about.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |