|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 10/13/2009 2:06 PM, Darren New wrote:
> http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2009/10/why_i_hate_star_trek.html
>
>
> This pretty much says why I consider science fiction to only be that
> where you couldn't write the story without the technology. Could Star
> Trek be written as a western or a Spanish Armada kind of story? Yes.
> Could Ringworld? Not hardly.
>
> If you can still tell the story without the technology, it's not SF.
> Oddly enough, most of the original Star Trek series that people liked
> the best (say, the one with the Horta) were ones where you couldn't take
> out the tech and tell the same story.
I'm OK with Star Trek on TV and in the movies (OK, maybe not so much in
the last ten years or so...). I'm a lot less tolerant of sub par science
fiction novels.
Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |