On 10/12/09 10:17, Warp wrote:
> Mike Raiford<"m[raiford]!at"@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> http://blogs.ngm.com/blog_central/2009/10/a-grander-k.html
>
>    Why can't the kilogram be defined as the weight of exactly 1 litre of
> pure water at a certain temperature? After all, that has been the de-facto
> definition for forever.

	Perhaps they could _change_ the definition to that, but I'm willing to 
bet that it's off by a bit from the current definition.

-- 
A tautology is a thing which is tautological.

Post a reply to this message