scott wrote:

> I've just started to dig the surface of XNA, but it seems to me to be 
> basically DirectX.net, which is not a bad thing.  I got a simple 2D and 
> then 3D program up and running in very little time, I'd say maybe 4 or 5 
> times quicker than I ever managed with C++ and DirectX.

I'm just impressed that somebody could write a program with C++ and 
DirectX and 1. have it actually work and 2. have it to something nontrivial.

I'm sure you remember my first C++ program. That was a trivial console 
application, and it *still* took miles of code. And it didn't even make 
any low-level system calls such as DirectX...

Post a reply to this message