POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.newusers : Simple question : Re: Simple question Server Time
5 Oct 2024 18:26:18 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Simple question  
From: Chris B
Date: 7 Oct 2009 04:23:11
Message: <4acc4fef$1@news.povray.org>
"clipka" <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote in message 
news:4aca85a1$1@news.povray.org...
> Chris B schrieb:
>>
>> Well, yes and no. JPEG is a lossy format (it's designed that way), but I 
>> find it by far and away the most convenient when working on graphics 
>> destined for web pages. Any implication that it's not a worthy format to 
>> be supported by POV-Ray makes me a tad nervous. I think it should find 
>> its way into the documentation, with a warning that it's not a loss-free 
>> format and that the results will unavoidably contain JPEG artifacts. 
>> People could then simply use another format for any process that requires 
>> some sort of top quality master.
>
> I think the rationale behind deliberately hiding this feature is that for 
> it to come anywhere close to being /useful/, some more work would need to 
> be invested; the default quality would have to be increased, and ideally a 
> quality parameter would have to be added.

Ahh! Well I first learned about it on these newsgroups years ago, so I don't 
think I've let a secret slip that wasn't already out there.

I don't know the POV source, d'you think that would be a big 
investment/change?  Is the JPEG compression just a standard codec library 
call at the end of the render?

Regards,
Chris B.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.