|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
>> > an OOP language for a design which has very little object-orientedness
>
>> Sure. Any time you give other processes access to all the member variables,
>> or have most of the routines just static functions, or etc. :-)
>
> I think singletons are a completely valid OOP technique. (OTOH, if your
> entire program consists of singletons, it becomes a bit dubious whether
> your program is object-oriented at all...)
Sure. I meant if all the objects/classes in the program have all the member
variables public and all the routines static, you're just using OO for the
modularity. Doing it that way occasionally doesn't hurt.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |