Warp wrote:
>   For example, many programs have a full-fledged OOD but are then
> implemented in a language which supports little to no OOP, most
> typically C 

Yep. That's what I'm saying. You can do "OOP" in any language, but a 
language has to support it natively for *me* to call it an "OO language."

 > an OOP language for a design which has very little object-orientedness

Sure. Any time you give other processes access to all the member variables, 
or have most of the routines just static functions, or etc. :-)

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".

Post a reply to this message