|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Warp wrote:
> For example, many programs have a full-fledged OOD but are then
> implemented in a language which supports little to no OOP, most
> typically C
Yep. That's what I'm saying. You can do "OOP" in any language, but a
language has to support it natively for *me* to call it an "OO language."
> an OOP language for a design which has very little object-orientedness
Sure. Any time you give other processes access to all the member variables,
or have most of the routines just static functions, or etc. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |