On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 00:15:49 -0400, nemesis wrote:

> clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
>> They really, absolutely, positively claim that this is /not/
>> photoshopped:
>>
>> http://cdn-www.cracked.com/articleimages/dan/cantbelieve5/chalk.jpg
>>
>> (Though they admit some "editing" /has/ been done - using several
>> liters of paint... see http://www.metanamorph.com, "Lave Burst")
> 
> Gotta love urban art.  Nowadays much better than old graffiti... :)

I've seen a few images done this way, always impressive to see more.

Jim

Post a reply to this message