|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
> I think you missed the whole point of it. It's not like he's selling the
> thing at Toy R Us (in fact, he's not selling it at all).
What's whether he's selling it or not got to do with it? He's modified a
lethal weapon deliberately to make it look like a child's toy, and what's
worse he has advertised it to the world and seems to be encouraging others
to do the same. To assume that a child never gets sight of this gun, or any
one of the number of copies he has influenced, seems a little naive.
People, even gun owners, are only human, mistakes do get made, which is why
we have thing in place to reduce the risks when mistakes get made - painting
a gun like a child's toy just seems to be increasing the risk to me.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |