|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New wrote:
> Because I program for a living, and 99% of the time it's tedious, error
> prone, and suckful. And the hardware hasn't stopped improving. But I'm
> still using the same programming techniques I used on my 2MHz
> sparkstation with 4Meg of RAM.
There are serious attempts to improve programmer efficiency, but they
are often met with derision and scorn.
Case in point: I mentioned to one of my instructors that I switched from
C++ to C#, and his response was, "So you took a step backward, then?"
You get even stronger reactions from people about Visual Basic. This,
despite the fact that VB and C# are both designed to *increase*
programmer efficiency.
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |