|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > I don't see it that language development has been stuck with OOP for 30
> > years.
> I haven't seen a new "wow, this is a great improvement" sort of thing
> happen, tho.
Was OOP a "wow, this is a great improvement" at the time it was introduced,
or was it a gradual shift, which we are now compressing into one big event
when looking back, 30 years after?
> > But otherwise I have seen a trend in programming design to move a bit
> > more away from pure OOP and more towards dynamic programming.
> What do *you* mean by the term "dynamic programming"? I know what I'd mean
> by it, but I don't know if your background would make it mean the same thing
> as mine does.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_programming_language
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |