Nicolas Alvarez schrieb:
> Ive <"ive### [at] lilysoft org"> wrote:
>> While I think it is a very good idea to use lut's for 8 bps I do believe
>> it should not be done for 16 bps as they are meant to apply things like
>> inverse gamma correction without *any* visual impact. But this is not an
>> important issue.
>
> What if it's a lookup table that maps a 16-bit integer into a 32-bit float?
> There wouldn't be any visual impact there...
I think what Ive means is that 16 bit per color channel should already
provide enough "headroom" to do the gamma correction in that format.
Post a reply to this message
|
