clipka wrote:

> What, actually, happened with the "re-render" function?

is that the functionality called "Rerun" in the Windows GUI?

> It was quite handy when trying to render only a section of the image and 
> the parser would hit an error. As this leaves you with a blank preview 
> window, there's no way to manually pick that same section again (except 
> for guessing), but in 3.6 you could at least re-try rendering the very 
> same section via the "re-render" command.

I didn't even know that was the behavior for Rerun with
the non-permanent selection in the error case (well I always
use shift-drag anyway). But I think it would be more intuitive
if the non-permanent selection simply remained active until
a render was either completed successfully or explicitely
aborted by the user (even for the normal render command).

Actually the reason I always use shift drag is that I most
often use this to render a section of the image at a higher
resolution, i.e. first "shift drag" region in lowres render,
click "set but don't render", increase resolution, render.

Post a reply to this message