Warp schrieb:
>> - Your statement fails to acknowledge that the I've presented /more/ 
>> arguments than just "it's done that way in megapov". You may not /agree/ 
>> with them, but they /are/ additional reasons.
> 
>   I don't see something like "it requires implementing additional syntax"
> to be any reason of any kind. The purpose is to make POV-Ray easier to use,
> not to save a half hour of the life of a source code programmer.

And /again/ it seems that /you/ try to define what /my/ arguments are - 
or you're not even reading them. Either way, it is /no/ way to discuss!

Post a reply to this message