Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
> Then I think you've trivially answered your question by making it impossible
> to determine the answer of whether or not we have free choice.
That's why they call it philosophy and not science. ;)
> > I find it a rather odd definition. "If the consequences are too complicated
> > to be predicted by us, then it's free will acting there."
> More like "if even we can't predict what our own choice would be in advance,
> then it's a free choice."
I don't consider purely random events "making a choice" either.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|