Darren New wrote:
> Tim Cook wrote:
>> One could argue that as a proof-point towards the existence of a
>> God-entity; something whose sole raison d'etre is to be an outside
>> observer which permits all the waveforms of the universe to collapse
>> to particles. XD
>
> One could, but one would be wrong. ;-)
Wrong? Qualitatively, it wouldn't be 'wrong' so much as
'unprovable'...either way. 'Wrong' is reserved for statements which are
*provably* untrue. 'Not provable'!='not right' or 'not wrong'
:3
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net
Post a reply to this message
|