Darren New wrote:
> Tim Cook wrote:
>> One could argue that as a proof-point towards the existence of a 
>> God-entity; something whose sole raison d'etre is to be an outside 
>> observer which permits all the waveforms of the universe to collapse 
>> to particles.  XD
> 
> One could, but one would be wrong. ;-)

Wrong?  Qualitatively, it wouldn't be 'wrong' so much as 
'unprovable'...either way.  'Wrong' is reserved for statements which are 
*provably* untrue.  'Not provable'!='not right' or 'not wrong'

:3

--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net

Post a reply to this message