clipka wrote:
> The interesting thing here being that there is no such thing as an 
> outside observer in this entire universe (as, by definition, such an 
> observer would obviously have to be not in but outside of it).
> 
> I guess it is safe to claim that a flesh-and-blood human being is not an 
> outside observer in this sense.
> 
> Or, to put it in other words: Observation is an illusion. The only thing 
> we have is interaction.

One could argue that as a proof-point towards the existence of a 
God-entity; something whose sole raison d'etre is to be an outside 
observer which permits all the waveforms of the universe to collapse to 
particles.  XD

--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.freesitespace.net

Post a reply to this message