clipka wrote:
> SharkD schrieb:
>> As I pointed out in my second post, the error only occurs after I 
>> apply the turbulence warp.
> 
> Probably because the object normally doesn't touch the "dangerous" 
> range, but the warp pertubs the coordinates in such a way that the 
> pattern's original y<=-1 range ends up "exposed".

Is it possible to do use an IF statement to substitute a different 
function where y<=-1?

-Mike

Post a reply to this message