|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Le_Forgeron schrieb:
> If you want pre-gamma correct value, maybe its time for a
> "srgb"/srgbf/... additional color code, specifying color in the silly
> sRGB space (and then parser will gamma correct it to linear space on the
> fly)
That's indeed an intriguing idea.
Would we also have sred, sgreen, sblue then for consistency?
One drawback, however, would be that the gamma should then be fixed to a
gamma of 2.2 for consistency (or actually even more complex processing
should be performed).
Another alternative might be to support "gamma X" as a prefix for any
color statement, as in:
... color gamma 2.2 rgb <0.3,0.4,0.2> ...
... color gamma 1.8 red 0.3 green 0.7 ...
> BTW, would you gamma-correct F or T ??? why ?
Of course not. Why should anyone?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |