Patrick Elliott schrieb:
>>   That may be only true if the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum 
>> mechanics
>> is true, which is not an accepted fact.
>>
> Isn't that a bit like saying that its not an accepted fact that the sky 
> is green due to large amounts of trees floating in the clouds? Its not 
> even "not accepted", its flat out wrong.

Quote from Wikipedia:

"According to a poll at a Quantum Mechanics workshop in 1997[7], the 
Copenhagen interpretation is the most widely-accepted specific 
interpretation of quantum mechanics"

So leaving aside that it /is/ apparently quite accepted (if only as a 
theory instead of a fact), what makes you so sure that it is "flat out 
wrong"?

Post a reply to this message