|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Patrick Elliott schrieb:
>> That may be only true if the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum
>> mechanics
>> is true, which is not an accepted fact.
>>
> Isn't that a bit like saying that its not an accepted fact that the sky
> is green due to large amounts of trees floating in the clouds? Its not
> even "not accepted", its flat out wrong.
Quote from Wikipedia:
"According to a poll at a Quantum Mechanics workshop in 1997[7], the
Copenhagen interpretation is the most widely-accepted specific
interpretation of quantum mechanics"
So leaving aside that it /is/ apparently quite accepted (if only as a
theory instead of a fact), what makes you so sure that it is "flat out
wrong"?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |