|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Tim Cook wrote:
> *is* it always (or even most often) the case?
That would be another example. It's not *always* the case. But then, would a
company fund a study and then publish the results if it actually went
against them? As in, there are 1000 things you could study about your
product. Why would you fund a study that has a good probability of putting
your product in a bad light? By the time you do the study, you already have
a *pretty* good idea of how it's likely to come out, or you wouldn't fund
the study.
And of course, if you fund a study about (say) the quality of your printers,
and you find out that your printer is only meh compared to the competition,
why would you publish that study?
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
I ordered stamps from Zazzle that read "Place Stamp Here".
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |