Alain <aze### [at] qwertyorg> wrote:
> I'm for it... when, and if, it actualy ADD something interesting to a scene.
> But, as for focal blur, you must be realy carefull about not overdoing it.
> Motion blur for the sake of motion blur is just baaaaaaaad!

  One could take a rather different view. For example: "Saying that motion
blur for the sake of motion blur is just bad is as silly as saying that
lighting just for the sake of lighting, or texturing just for the sake of
texturing, is bad. Like those, motion blur is a visual tool. Just because
it's used doesn't automatically make it good or bad."

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message