Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> The shining example was "This tax is not a tax..."
> which sounds outrageous, but the line reads more like "This tax is not a
> tax for the purposes of determining, via total taxes paid, how much
> something costs."
> 
> Debate would be lovely, but the video isn't debate. It is funny though.

You can't debate fools, all they do is drag you down to their level. 
And, their level is to never read the actual document, but instead read 
one of dozens of *reposted* copies of a list of supposed "problems" 
published by some moron on the Liberty University website. For those 
that don't know, this is a super-right wing, Biblical literalist, so 
called college, which recently tried to have its "Bible Science" courses 
accredited by other colleges as valid for the use as entry requirements 
for more advanced classes, like molecular biology and physics. They are 
serious nutcases.

Among their other gems have been the suggestion that the government or 
doctors could "withdraw" funds from your bank account via automatic 
payment, when the actual section refers to streamlining the process of 
doctors *paying* to and from insurance companies, instead of having to 
send them paper checks, or other less efficient stuff.

In some cases they don't just leave off sections, they exaggerate shit 
to the point of pure stupidity.

-- 
void main () {

     if version = "Vista" {
       call slow_by_half();
       call DRM_everything();
     }
     call functional_code();
   }
   else
     call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models, 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message