Tim Attwood <tim### [at] anti-spamcomcastnet> wrote:
> >I warmly recommend you to read some debunking websites besides those hoax
> >theory websites. Then make an informed decision on whether the explanations
> >make sense and which possibility is more plausible.

> I'm not sure it's really worth my time, there's not going
> to be any proof that misplacing the tapes is incompetence
> as NASA claims, vrs intentional as I suspect.

  So because there's no absolute proof either way, you choose to believe
the most implausible explanation rather than the simpler, plausible one?
And this even in the light of everything else (mentioned in this thread
and all those debunkin sites).

  Again, think about the alternatives:

1) Due to bureucracy, carelessnes or whatever, they lost some material.
It's not like this kind of thing has never happened to any big organization.

2) There was a conspiracy and some of the material was faked, and everyone
involved and everyone who ever suspected foul play has kept quiet for the
past 40 years.

  Which explanation is more plausible to you?

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message