Warp wrote:

>   I just figured out the *perfect* example of a situation where you want
> raw, linear pixel values which are *not* gamma-corrected: When you are
> rendering an image which will be used as input to create a heightfield.
> 
>   There 0.5 should mean exactly half height, not a height of 0.73.
> 
>   clipca asked some time ago *why* one would ever want linear, uncorrected
> pixel values. There you have your perfect example.

I think 3.7 needs a simple flag: Gamma_Correction on will apply gamma 
correction to the file, off will not apply gamma correction to the file 
(and will not write a gAMA chunk to PNG files)



-- 
~Mike

Post a reply to this message