Eero Ahonen <aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > 
> >   That sounds quite shallow. Don't you know that what matters is not the
> > external beauty, but the internal beauty (in other words, what's inside
> > the clothes)?
> > 

> Yes, but that's hard to say from photos from the internet. And the
> external beauty plays its part, too. After all that *is* one reason to
> notice the girl at first place.

> Actually, "what's inside the clothes" as definition of internal beauty
> sounds... wrong. That sounds like the key would be the other parts of
> external beauty but head. I've always understood the internal beauty as
> something that's inside the head, ie. world of thoughts. I did write a
> longer story about to the message you replied, but when I red it again
> it was way too badly formed. The main message was that it's the most
> important thing that thoughts are in sync.

  You seem to have missed that it was a joke.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message