Warp wrote:
> 
>   That sounds quite shallow. Don't you know that what matters is not the
> external beauty, but the internal beauty (in other words, what's inside
> the clothes)?
> 

Yes, but that's hard to say from photos from the internet. And the
external beauty plays its part, too. After all that *is* one reason to
notice the girl at first place.

Actually, "what's inside the clothes" as definition of internal beauty
sounds... wrong. That sounds like the key would be the other parts of
external beauty but head. I've always understood the internal beauty as
something that's inside the head, ie. world of thoughts. I did write a
longer story about to the message you replied, but when I red it again
it was way too badly formed. The main message was that it's the most
important thing that thoughts are in sync.

-Aero

Post a reply to this message