|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Indeed. A Turning machine is a *machine*. It's readily obvious how you'd implement
it, or something resembling it.
Kind of vice versa, really.
> It's a language, not a machine for running a language.
Well, you could imagine a machine to do it. Just hard to figure out how
you'd build such a thing.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Understanding the structure of the universe
via religion is like understanding the
structure of computers via Tron.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |