Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Indeed. A Turning machine is a *machine*. It's readily obvious how you'd implement
it, or something resembling it. 

Kind of vice versa, really.

> It's a language, not a machine for running a language.

Well, you could imagine a machine to do it. Just hard to figure out how 
you'd build such a thing.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Understanding the structure of the universe
    via religion is like understanding the
     structure of computers via Tron.

Post a reply to this message