|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Jim Henderson wrote:
> The SCO trustees aren't really involved in the case. The appeals court
> just overturned the decision of the lower court (except for the monies
> due Novell from SCO's license to Sun = more drain on the SCO bank
> account) and told the lower court that a jury has to decide the ownership
> back here in Utah.
>
I stand corrected
> Personally, I think it's likely SCO will not emerge from bankruptcy
> (though this ruling does give SCO something to take back to the
> bankruptcy court to say "we have money coming", so that court may hold
> off on throwing them into Chapter 7). I'm biased, but I don't think SCO
> will prevail.
>
Personally, I hope not but something's happening
http://sev.prnewswire.com/banking-financial-services/20090824/LA6565824082009-1.html
Do they really think that they might attract further investments or is
this part of a smokescreen?
Groklaw is understandably cynical; see Update 5 on
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090824142203182
> But I think you're right, this could drag on past our lifetimes at this
> rate. ;-)
...and possibly our children's lifetimes ;-)
John
--
"Eppur si muove" - Galileo Galilei
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |