Jim Henderson wrote:
> The SCO trustees aren't really involved in the case.  The appeals court 
> just overturned the decision of the lower court (except for the monies 
> due Novell from SCO's license to Sun = more drain on the SCO bank 
> account) and told the lower court that a jury has to decide the ownership 
> back here in Utah.
> 

I stand corrected

> Personally, I think it's likely SCO will not emerge from bankruptcy 
> (though this ruling does give SCO something to take back to the 
> bankruptcy court to say "we have money coming", so that court may hold 
> off on throwing them into Chapter 7).  I'm biased, but I don't think SCO 
> will prevail.
> 

Personally, I hope not but something's happening

http://sev.prnewswire.com/banking-financial-services/20090824/LA6565824082009-1.html
Do they really think that they might attract further investments or is
this part of a smokescreen?

Groklaw is understandably cynical; see Update 5 on
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090824142203182

> But I think you're right, this could drag on past our lifetimes at this 
> rate. ;-)

...and possibly our children's lifetimes ;-)

John
-- 
"Eppur si muove" - Galileo Galilei

Post a reply to this message