clipka wrote:
> Invisible schrieb:
>> The way I read it, they had a structure with two integers and a void 
>> pointer. "But we couldn't just add an extra integer field, because 
>> we'd have to change a few thousand other functions." I'm not seeing 
>> why changing a structure to have a new field which is only used in 
>> certain places is a problem.
> 
> It wasn't a structure: It was a callback function signature.

Oh, right. I thought it was a C struct.

If you're got to actually change function prototypes then, yeah, that's 
not going to happen...

Post a reply to this message