|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New wrote:
> Yes, that's exactly how it worked, and yes, that's exactly why they
> weren't issued sequentially. :-)
Just a quirk of terminology, then, because I consider "sequentially
within batches" to be mostly equivalent to "sequentially" ;)
...Chambers
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |