Chambers wrote:
> Why can't you allocate sequentially by hand?  It's not like counting is 
> hard.

You can't allocate sequentially by hand if you have multiple hands.

> "OK, Washington State is going to get the batch 542-XX-XXXX."

That's not very sequential if New York is allocating from batch 123-XX-XXXX 
by hand at the same time, yes?

Yes, that's exactly how it worked, and yes, that's exactly why they weren't 
issued sequentially. :-)

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
    back to version 1.0."
   "We've done that already. We call it 2.0."

Post a reply to this message