|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Chambers wrote:
> Why can't you allocate sequentially by hand? It's not like counting is
> hard.
You can't allocate sequentially by hand if you have multiple hands.
> "OK, Washington State is going to get the batch 542-XX-XXXX."
That's not very sequential if New York is allocating from batch 123-XX-XXXX
by hand at the same time, yes?
Yes, that's exactly how it worked, and yes, that's exactly why they weren't
issued sequentially. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
"We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
back to version 1.0."
"We've done that already. We call it 2.0."
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |