Neeum Zawan wrote:
>     For context, [...]

>     Actually, sometimes the insurance company more or less forces the 
> employers to drop insurance or go elsewhere.

Or to drop the problematic employee, yes.

Of course it's more complex. I'm just saying it's different than shopping 
for other stuff, in ways that capitalism generally doesn't account for. 
Complaining that a "public option" is therefor uncapitalistic is not 
necessarily a bad thing. It would be like complaining that the government is 
paying for the military instead of letting individuals buy whatever military 
coverage they feel is appropriate.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
    back to version 1.0."
   "We've done that already. We call it 2.0."

Post a reply to this message