|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > In light of this, it starts sounding less ridiculous Steve Ballmer calling
> > Linux "communism".
> Viewed economically, isn't that what Linux is, in essence? Why would it be
> ridiculous at all?
> (I mean, sure, Ballmer clearly was using the term pejoratively, but why is
> it factually incorrect?)
Linux doesn't forbid commercial use?
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |