Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> >   In light of this, it starts sounding less ridiculous Steve Ballmer calling
> > Linux "communism".

> Viewed economically, isn't that what Linux is, in essence? Why would it be 
> ridiculous at all?

> (I mean, sure, Ballmer clearly was using the term pejoratively, but why is 
> it factually incorrect?)

  Linux doesn't forbid commercial use?

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message