Neeum Zawan wrote:
>     Why give them valid points when invalid points seem to do the job 
> almost as well?

Invalid points do *better*, because there's no rationality behind it. Is it 
easier to convince someone their rational beliefs are wrong, or their 
religious beliefs?  The point isn't to find problems with the plan. The 
point is to prevent the plan from progressing, which is best done by 
throwing irrational unanswerable ranting at the planners.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
    back to version 1.0."
   "We've done that already. We call it 2.0."

Post a reply to this message