Neeum Zawan wrote:
>     And as an FYI, the only place I encounter people talking about 
> Erlang is on this newsgroup (namely, Darren). Haskell I see elsewhere.

It's mostly big in database settings. It's basically best for implementing 
distributed high-load database type stuff, not so good for normal-sized 
programming. If you want literally 100% uptime for 30 years, use Erlang.

-- 
   Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   "We'd like you to back-port all the changes in 2.0
    back to version 1.0."
   "We've done that already. We call it 2.0."

Post a reply to this message