|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Chambers wrote:
> Saul Luizaga wrote:
>> You just don't like to be corrected
>
> This sounds more like you.
right...
>
> Believe it or not, this subject is an official Dead Horse. Please stop
> beating it, you'll only get a bloody mess.
>
>> I made a search on p.o-t on the subject
>
> First, p.o-t is the wrong forum.
> Second, posts here expire.
>
>> was: "are you ABSOLUTELY SURE it won't work...?"
>
> No, you didn't even ask a question.
news://news.povray.org:119/4a850da7@news.povray.org, check the last
paragraph, proves you wrong. Did you liked to be corrected?
>
> This is something which, by your own words, you have just heard about.
> You then quoted a whole bunch of marketing blurbs about it.
>
> Trust me. We have not just heard about it, but have been looking at the
> idea for more than *10 years* now. I haven't specifically looked at
> OpenCL, but I have CUDA, and the underlying hardware hasn't changed
> enough yet to overcome the inherent limitations in the system.
>
>> To the subject: I don't know much about GPUs, POV-Ray internals,
>> programming, nor OpenCL,
>
> Then why is it so hard for you to accept that this isn't a good idea at
> this time?
>
> If you really want to help make POV-Ray better, the source code is
> available. Please, dig in! Start reading the p.p group, and look at
> some of the outstanding bugs! That would surely be appreciated more
> than your parroting some random marketing blurbs.
>
> ....Chambers
So open minded... thanks, I out of here for good.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |