|
|
Warp schrieb:
> Maybe, if there's a good economical reason to do so. However, I'd say
> equal tax % for everybody is a good lower limit (well, as long as that %
> is not exorbitant). Rewarding success shouldn't be done at the cost of
> punishing poor performance. That's morally daunting.
There would also be the problem that most rich people are rich because
they were born into a rich family, and most poorer people are poorer
because they were born into a poorer family.
Success may not always depend on performance, but also on the possession
of assets.
Post a reply to this message
|
|