|
|
Warp schrieb:
>> It's a question of rates. In the US, the percentage of the overall
>> wealth owned by the top 1% keeps increasing (depending on who you ask -
>> I'm seeing some contradictory figures). That's a net flow in that
>> direction.
>
> Is that a bad thing? I'm asking that seriously.
As long as they act responsible, I find nothing wrong.
If however /they/ exhibit greed, then I'm not surprised that the
/others/ exhibit jealousy.
> A bit of balance between rich and poor can be achieved with progressive
> taxing (ie. tax rich people with a higher percentage than poor people),
I just heard a report on the radio of a millionaire who openly revealed
that he pays no more than about 3000 EUR a year in taxes, due to tax
loopholes.
/That's/ the sort of things that make poorer people /seriously/ jealous.
> Is there any rational reason to punish rich people with heavy taxes,
> other than jealousy and a generic sentiment of "fairness"?
From the social market economy point of view, this has nothing to do
with punishment, but having those who /can/ carry a lot actually /do/
carry a lot.
Doesn't always seem to work, as seen from that millionaire example.
Post a reply to this message
|
|