On Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:59:03 -0400, Warp wrote:

>   If that's someone's honest opinion, it has one major flaw: Basically
>   the
> person is saying that poor people should be left to die because society
> (in other words, the citizens of the country) should have no obligation
> of keeping poor people alive and healthy. In other words, that poor
> people deserve no help from people who can afford helping them.

It strikes me as somewhat ironic that there are those who believe that 
the poor should be left to die, yet deny Darwin's "survival of the 
fittest" (as an element of the theory of evolution).  They want "social 
Darwinism" based on class but deny it exists.

(Mostly joking here)

Jim

Post a reply to this message